Early preclinical detection of prions in the skin of prion-infected animals
Published: 16 January 2019
Early preclinical detection of prions in the skin of prion-infected animals
Zerui Wang, Matteo Manca, Aaron Foutz, Manuel V. Camacho, Gregory J. Raymond, Brent Race, Christina D. Orru, Jue Yuan, Pingping Shen, Baiya Li, Yue Lang, Johnny Dang, Alise Adornato, Katie Williams, Nicholas R. Maurer, Pierluigi Gambetti, Bin Xu, Witold Surewicz, Robert B. Petersen, Xiaoping Dong, Brian S. Appleby, Byron Caughey, Li Cui, Qingzhong Kong & Wen-Quan Zou Nature Communicationsvolume 10, Article number: 247 (2019) |
A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 04 February 2019 This article has been updated
Abstract
A definitive pre-mortem diagnosis of prion disease depends on brain biopsy for prion detection currently and no validated alternative preclinical diagnostic tests have been reported to date. To determine the feasibility of using skin for preclinical diagnosis, here we report ultrasensitive serial protein misfolding cyclic amplification (sPMCA) and real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assays of skin samples from hamsters and humanized transgenic mice (Tg40h) at different time points after intracerebral inoculation with 263K and sCJDMM1 prions, respectively. sPMCA detects skin PrPSc as early as 2 weeks post inoculation (wpi) in hamsters and 4 wpi in Tg40h mice; RT-QuIC assay reveals earliest skin prion-seeding activity at 3 wpi in hamsters and 20 wpi in Tg40h mice. Unlike 263K-inoculated animals, mock-inoculated animals show detectable skin/brain PrPSc only after long cohabitation periods with scrapie-infected animals. Our study provides the proof-of-concept evidence that skin prions could be a biomarker for preclinical diagnosis of prion disease.
snip...
Discussion Several lines of evidence have recently suggested that skin is the place where misfolded proteins often stay, which may play a role in the pathogenesis and early detection of neurodegenerative diseases25. While it has been known for a long time that sheep and goats with scrapie often have skin lesions26, prions had not been detected in skin until prion infectivity was first found in skin of prion-infected greater kudu using an animal-based bioassay27. Subsequently, skin PrPSc was detected directly by western blotting after the enrichment of PrPSc in experimentally or naturally scrapie-infected hamsters and sheep, as well as in a single cadaver with vCJD28,29. We recently observed both prion-seeding activity and prion infectivity in the skin of patients with sCJD and vCJD at the terminal stage of the diseases using RT-QuIC assay and a bioassay humanized Tg mouse-based, respectively13. In the current study, we further demonstrated that skin PrPSc is preclinically detectable not only by RT-QuIC, but also by sPMCA before brain damage occurs in two animal models of prion diseases, 263K-inoculated hamsters and sCJDMM1-inoculated humanized Tg40h mice, with parallel RT-QuIC findings in an independent set of scrapie-infected hamsters done in an independent laboratory.
In terms of the earliest time point at which skin PrPSc becomes detectable in animals infected by the intracerebral inoculation of prions, sPMCA showed detection at 2 wpi for hamsters and 4 wpi for Tg40h mice, while RT-QuIC detection was at 3 wpi for hamsters and 20 wpi for Tg40h (Fig. 8a). These findings indicate that skin PrPSc is detectable at least 5 weeks earlier in scrapie-infected animals before brain pathology is observed. Of the five body areas examined, the ear pinna and back skin were the areas that showed earliest prion-seeding activity (3 wpi), while the thigh skin was the latest (9 wpi). The latter was also confirmed by two sets of hamsters examined in two-independent laboratories in this study. In contrast to the prion-seeding activity found in the skin of infected hamsters at the early stage of infection, the earliest time point showing skin prion-seeding activity was at 20 wpi in humanized Tg mice by RT-QuIC (Fig. 8b). This time point was similar whether recombinant hamster or human PrP substrate was used despite our expectation that human PrP might provide a more sensitive RT-QuIC for human PrPSc based on better sequence homology between the seeds and substrate.
Although the reasons for early and widespread presence of PrPSc in the skin remain unclear, possibilities include the spread of the prion inoculum itself, or endogenously replicating prions, from the brain through the peripheral nerves to the skin within the 2–3 weeks required for the first detection by our ultrasensitive sPMCA and RT-QuIC assays. PrP seeding activity has been detected in the blood in the prion-infected hamsters and deer immediately after peripheral inoculation including oral, nasal, or blood route30. However, no reports have shown that PrPSc is consistently detectable in the blood of prion-infected hamsters within 2 weeks post intracerebral inoculation. Thus, the early spread of PrPSc from the brain-to-the skin in the intracerebrally 263K-inoculated hamsters is likely either not through the blood or, if initially from the blood, requires time-dependent concentration or replication in the skin to become detectable.
It is unclear why, according to RT-QuIC, the back skin more consistently accumulates PrPSc than the other skin areas tested. It may depend on the dermatomes of nerves and their distance from the CNS. Between the back and thigh areas examined, the back dermatome is more proximate to the CNS. Similarly, we found prion-seeding activity much earlier in the ear area than the thigh (3 wpi vs 9 wpi). Analogously, misfolded α-synuclein deposition in Parkinson’s disease patients is more frequently detected in proximate (100% in the cervical C7 site) compared to distal (35% in the thoracic T12 region) skin areas by immunofluorescence microscopy31,32,33. In future studies, it would be interesting to determine whether PrPSc in the skin of sCJD has a similar distribution, and whether factors besides dermatome distance from the brain are involved.
Both sPMCA and RT-QuIC assays detected skin PrPSc early in scrapie-infected hamsters. However, sPMCA amplified PrPSc in skin samples from CJD-infected Tg40 mice at 4 wpi, while RT-QuIC assay detected prion-seeding activity only at 20 wpi (Fig. 8). The reason for the difference in Tg40 mice is not clear, but may be due in part to differences between the assays and the prion strains involved. sPMCA is performed in brain homogenates, which provide naturally post-translationally modified (glycosylated and GPI-anchored) PrPC as the substrate, and other potential brain-derived co-factors. RT-QuIC reactions include only unmodified recombinant PrPC as substrate, and no natural co-factors. sPMCA reactions are accelerated by sonication, whereas RT-QuIC reactions are shaken. Also, in successive rounds of sPMCA, the substrate and other brain components are refreshed, but our RT-QuIC reactions were performed in one round, with no refreshment. To exclude the effect of mismatch between seeds and substrates on the sensitivity of RT-QuIC reactions, we tested two recombinant PrP molecules as substrates from two different species including hamster and human and they all showed the similar sensitivity with the same earliest time point at 20 wpi. Finally, 263K scrapie and MM1 sCJD prions undoubtedly differ in conformation, and therefore, perhaps, their interactions with co-factors, various PrPC substrates, and/or skin-derived inhibitors of RT-QuIC reactions. These factors might differentially affect the sensitivity of detection of MM1 sCJD in the skin of Tg40 mice by sPMCA and RT-QuIC. It is also possible that the RT-QuIC assay may become as sensitive as sPMCA for skin prion detection in the Tg40h mice after further optimization of RT-QuIC’s experimental conditions.
Our early detection of PrPSc in the skin of sCJD- and scrapie-infected rodents suggests that it may be possible to do the same with the skin of humans who carry PrP mutations associated with genetic prion diseases such as familial CJD, Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker syndrome, or fatal familial insomnia because it is expected that their mutant PrPC spontaneously converts into PrPSc and accumulates later in life. Skin-based RT-QuIC may reveal early prion-seeding activity in PrP mutation-carriers, or people with suspected exposures to prion infections, while they are still asymptomatic. Even for suspected sCJD cases, who are only identified in the symptomatic phase, skin-based RT-QuIC might be useful for monitoring disease progression, defining severity and diversity, and evaluating the treatment efficacy when potential drugs become available.
Although neither clinical signs nor brain PrPSc were observed in control animals cohabitating with 263K-inoculated hamsters within 12 weeks, the mock-inoculated animals that were housed with scrapie-infected animals had amplifiable PrPSc in the brain and skin via amplification techniques. Moreover, in contrast to the skin PrPSc amplified from the 263K-inoculated hamsters as early as 2 wpi, the control animals that co-habitated with infected hamsters were found to have amplified skin PrPSc after cohabitation for 11 weeks. This finding implies that the skin PrPSc detected early in the scrapie-infected hamsters is not the result of environmental contamination; otherwise, the control animals would exhibit skin PrPSc at 2 wpi as well. The finding of skin PrPSc in the cohabitating control animals may be relevant to the environmental transmission of prions observed in natural animal prion diseases, such as scrapie and CWD. Interestingly, prion transmission has been observed in hamsters by contact with prion-contaminated surfaces through rubbing and bedding34, in which cases skin is expected to be involved. The role that skin may plays in the environmental transmission of prions warrants future investigation.
Skin PrPSc may derive from urine or fecal prion contamination in addition to possible skin shedding due to scratching or biting each other. Indeed, scrapie infectivity was reported in the urine of prion-infected mice coincident with lymphocytic nephritis during their preclinical and clinical stages of prion infection35,36. It was also observed in their urine in intracerebrally inoculated hamsters even without any apparent inflammation21. In addition, deer with clinical CWD and mild to moderate nephritis were found to have sPMCA-detectable PrPSc and CWD-infectivity in urine22. Using sPMCA, PrPSc was detected in urine of ~80% of the hamsters intraperitoneally inoculated with 263K prions at the symptomatic stage23. Notably, PrPSc was detected in urine, but only at the terminal stage of disease in intracerebrally inoculated hamsters, except for a few days immediately after oral administration24. Similar to the observations by Gonzalez-Romero et al.23, Murayama et al. also found that not all infected hamsters had detectable urine PrPSc even at the terminal stage24. The skin PrPSc detected early in the intracerebrally infected hamsters, but not in the co-habitated-negative controls, at 2 wpi suggests that skin prions may not result from urine at the early stage of infection.
Unlike the situation with urine, it has not been very clear whether PrPSc is present in feces of intracerebrally inoculated hamsters at the early stage of prion infection. High titers of prion infectivity were detected in feces throughout the disease incubation in orally inoculated hamsters while low levels of infectivity were occasionally observed in intracerebrally- or intraperitoneally-inoculated animals18. For instance, no prion infectivity was detected in feces of hamsters within 3 wpi, including at 1, 2, and 22 days post inoculation (dpi), except for 8 dpi when 17% transmission rate was detected in feces18. However, fecal PrPSc was only detected during the clinical stage of disease by sPMCA in hamsters with lower doses of oral inoculum19. Western blotting of fecal extracts showed shedding of PrPSc in the excrement at 24–72 h post inoculation, but not at 0–24 h post inoculation, or at later preclinical or clinical time points19. Consistent with this observation, prion infectivity was not detected in feces of mule deer after oral challenge with CWD prions within the first 12–16 wpi, but feces contained infectivity after 36 wpi through to clinical disease stages at 64–80 wpi20. It is likely that PrPSc is present in feces of infected animals at the late stage of prion infection, which may contaminate the skin of cohabitating control animals.
Although prion contamination of skin by excrement may not be a major concern in human prion diseases, it is an important issue for prion transmission in animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats, and cervids. It is worth noting that the high incidence of scrapie in sheep and goats as well as CWD in cervids is believed to be attributable to contamination of the environment due to high prion shedding. The detection of PrPSc in excretions including saliva, urine, and feces clearly indicates this shedding. Oral ingestion due to the coprophagic behavior of animals has been believed to cause wide horizontal transmission of scrapie and CWD. However, our current finding of skin PrPSc in cohabitating prion-inoculated and PBS-inoculated control animals, as well as the occurrence of brain PrPSc in the PBS-inoculated animals at the late stage suggests that prion contamination of skin may be a potential route of transmission of prion diseases.
In conclusion, our study indicates that skin PrPSc may be a useful biomarker not only for the preclinical diagnosis of prion diseases, but also for monitoring disease progression following infection and treatment. Since the chance that PrPSc can be consistently detected in blood and urine of sCJD patients by sPMCA and RT-QuIC assays has been virtually very low10,11,37, it is possible that detection of PrPSc in the skin, a highly accessible tissue, could be developed for evaluating therapeutic efficiency and drug screening. As mentioned earlier, RT-QuIC analysis of CSF and nasal brushing specimens to date has been used for diagnosis of human prion diseases only at the clinical stage. Moreover, it is much less practical in live animals to collect CSF and nasal brushing specimens. In cervids, at least, there has been more focus on RT-QuIC analyses of RAMALT biopsies and various excreta38. Although these analyses are currently the most accurate tests available for chronic wasting disease in live cervids, they do not yet provide 100% diagnostic sensitivity and specificity38. Thus, it may be helpful to have additional or alternative diagnostic specimens, such as skin or ear pinna punches, for RT-QuIC and sPMCA testing.
Oral ingestion due to the coprophagic behavior of animals has been believed to cause wide horizontal transmission of scrapie and CWD.
***> However, our current finding of skin PrPSc in cohabitating prion-inoculated and PBS-inoculated control animals, as well as the occurrence of brain PrPSc in the PBS-inoculated animals at the late stage suggests that prion contamination of skin may be a potential route of transmission of prion diseases.
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 04, 2018
Case Western Reserve researchers to examine skin prions in fatal neurodegenerative disease $2.9 million NIH grant focuses on transmission and diagnostic testing
FRIDAY, MARCH 30, 2018
Detection of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions in skin: implications for healthcare
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Singeltary
To: Sent: Thu, Nov 23, 2017 10:22 am
Subject: re-NIH scientists and collaborators find infectious prion protein in skin of CJD patients
>>>Although sCJD patient skin contained ~103- to 105-fold lower prion seeding activity than did sCJD patient brain tissue, all 12 mice from two transgenic mouse lines inoculated with sCJD skin homogenates from two sCJD patients succumbed to prion disease within 564 days after inoculation<<<
for something to be 103 to 105 fold lower prion seeding, yet still be 100% fatal in all test subjects, very disturbing...terry
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2017
NIH scientists and collaborators find infectious prion protein in skin of CJD patients
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2017
Prion seeding activity and infectivity in skin samples from patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
Accessing transmissibility and diagnostic marker of skin prions.
Kong, Qingzhong Safar, Jiri G. Zou, Wen-Quan
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2016
Accessing transmissibility and diagnostic marker of skin prions
A Kiss of a Prion: New Implications for Oral Transmissibility
The transmissibility of scrapie among sheep (intraspecies) is well recognized. It must be emphasized that horizontal transfer (from one individual to another) of scrapie is the main route of infection, because vertical transmission of disease from mother to offspring via milk or placental tissue occurs infrequently. Thus, in view of the report by Maddison et al, the oral transmissibility of prions among sheep may serve as a major route for horizontal scrapie transfer. This occurrence is plausible because sheep often lick each other. Maddison et al [10] indicate that, because of the similarities in prion tissue distribution, their implications for the oral transmission of ovine scrapie might be true for other prion diseases, such as cervid chronic wasting disease and human vCJD. If this is true for humans, a kiss of a prion may sometimes have lethal consequences.
PERSON TO PERSON TRANSMISSION OF THE TSE PRION DISEASE, never say never. as the disease mutates, it becomes more virulent in some cases, and cwd is efficiently transmitted from cervid to cervid. there are now multiple strains of CWD in cervids, as with the TSE prion disease in bovine, sheep and goats, and we now have the atypical TSE in these species, that have mutated, and some strains _have_ become more virulent. we now have younger humans dying from the TSE prion disease, with shorter incubation period, and that are much younger. human to human casual transmission of the TSE prion disease...again, never say never. ...TSS
see more here;
The occurrence of the disease in a patient who had contact with cases of familial C.J.D., but was not genetically related, has been described in Chile (Galvez et al., 1980) and in France (Brown et al., 1979b). In Chile the patient was related by marriage, but with no consanguinity, and had social contact with subsequently affected family members for 13 years before developing the disease. The contact case in France also married into a family in which C.J.D. was prevalent and had close contact with an affected member. In neither instance did the spouse of the non-familial case have the disease. The case described in this report was similarly related to affected family members and social contact had occurred for 20 years prior to developing C.J.D. If contact transmission had occurred, the minimum transmission period would be 11 years. Contact between sporadic cases has not been described and it is remarkable that possible contact transmissions have all been with familial cases. No method of transmission by casual social contact has been suggested.
***The occurrence of contact cases raises the possibility that transmission in families may be effected by an unusually virulent strain of the agent.
snip...see full text here;
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2016
Prion-Seeding Activity Is widely Distributed in Tissues of Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Patients
UST OUT CDC;
Tuesday, November 20, 2018
Eyes of CJD patients show evidence of prions Finding could help early diagnosis, raise concern for eye exams and transplants.
Singeltary 1999
***> THE EYES HAVE IT, CJD, AND THEY COULD BE STEALING THEM FROM YOUR LOVED ONE!...year 1999
i said that 20 years ago about this very thing. but did anyone listen...no!
prepare for the storm...terry
year 1999 to 2000
Subject: RE-The Eyes Have It (cjd) and they could be stealing them from your loved one... "pay back time"
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:04:26 -0700
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
######### Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy #########
Greetings List Members,
I hate to keep kicking a madcow, but this still is very disturbing to me. Not only for the recipient of the cornea's, but as well, for the people whom would be operated on, using the same tools that were used to put those stolen cornea's in the recipient with. No history of this donor or his family (re-ffi), or anything would be known, using stolen organs and or tissue's. I just think this is not only wrong, but very dangerous to a great many other people, as this is one of the most infectious tissues of TSE's. It seems that this practice of stealing organ/tissue happens more than we think. Anyway, the family of the victim which had their cornea's stolen, are now suing. In the example I used with my Mother, if 3 months before, she would have been in a catastrophic accident (car wreck, whatever), no autopsy (for whatever reason), no family (for whatever reason), she lay in the morgue, and after 4 hours, they come steal the cornea's, lot of people could have been infected, just because of lack of medical history of donor/family. It may be hypothetical, but very real. We need to stop the spread of this disease.
kind regards, Terry S. Singeltary Sr., Bacliff, Texas USA
===========================================
Previous story--
Cadaver corneal transplants -- without family permission...
Cadaver corneal transplants -- without family permission Houston, Texas channel 11 news 28 Nov 99
Reported by Terry S. Singeltary Sr.son of CJD victim
"It was a story about how the Lions eye bank were harvesting corneas from victims in the Morgue, without their consent. Under Texas law, this appears to be legal (remember Texas has the Veggie liable law). Even if Family says no, this appears to happen, from what the news story said.
They said the only way to prevent this, is to fill out a form, stating not to have this done. So if you don't fill out the form, they can do this. How many people don't know about the form?
This is not only disgusting and appalling, it could be highly infectious. Without proper background checking of the donors, on their physical history, checking on past dementia, and/or family history, some of these unfortunate victims, could be passing a human TSE.
Response Jill Spitler Clevelland Eye Bank:
"No, we are not stealing.........Yes, you do have such a law in the state of Texas, but not all your state Eye Banks utilize the law. The Eye Bank that you're speaking of is only one of 43 certified Eye Bank throughout the USA.
And there are measure taken per the Medical Standards of the Eye Bank Association of America, the certifying body for eye banks and per FDA regulations to address those concerns that you speak of.
I would suggest that those interested/concern with transplant contact their local agencies. The Eye Bank Association of America has a web. site . Further if anyone has problems contacting or finding out about their local organization(s), call me or e-mail me I would be glad to help. My e-mail address is jill@clevelandeyebank.org"
Terry Singeltary responds:
"Explain this to the family in Houston who went to their loved ones funeral, only to find out that the loved one that was in the casket, had their corneas removed without their permission, without the consent of the victim or it's family. They would not have known it, only for the funny look the victim had. So, they questioned, only to find out, the corneas, had in fact, been removed without consent.
I call that stealing, regardless what the law states. This type of legal grave robbing is not a logical thing to do without knowing any type of background of the victims medical past, which really will not prove anything due to the incubation period. Eye tissue being potentially a highly infective source, there are risks here.
Should they not at least know of the potential ramifications of TSE's (the person receiving the corneas)?
Should there not be some sort of screening?
Should there be some sort of moral issue here?
If this is the case, and in fact, they can come take your corneas, without your consent, then what will they start taking next, without your consent?
Lets look at a hypothetical situation:
What would happen if my Mom (DOD 12-14-97 hvCJD) would have gotten into a car wreck and died, before the symptoms of CJD appeared. Not much money, so there was no autopsy. What would have happened to that recipient of those infecting corneas?"
Comment (webmaster): Actual transmission of CJD by means of corneal transplant may or may not be rare. The incidence of infectivity in older people could be fairly high; this is not to be confused with the lower incidence of symptomatic (clinical) CJD. It is very unlikely that familial CJD would have been diagnosed in earlier generations; however, without interviewing the family even known kindreds would not be excluded.
In blood donation, a much stricter policy is followed, even though corneal transplant may be far more dangerous (being a direct link to the brain and not going through purification steps).
Since highly sensitive tests for pre-clinical CJD are now available, it would make sense to screen corneas for CJD, just as they are screened for AIDS, hepatitus, and a host of other conditions.
Eye procedure raises CJD concerns
BySTEVE MITCHELL, Medical Correspondent
WASHINGTON, Nov. 18 (UPI) -- A New York man who died from a rare brain disorder similar to mad cow disease in May underwent an eye procedure prior to his death that raises concerns about the possibility of transmitting the fatal disease to others, United Press International has learned.
The development comes on the heels of the announcement Thursday by U.S. Department of Agriculture officials of a possible second case of mad cow disease in U.S. herds.
Richard Da Silva, 58, of Orange County, N.Y., died from Creutzfeldt Jakob disease, an incurable brain-wasting illness that strikes about one person per million.
Richard's wife Ann Marie Da Silva told UPI he underwent a check for the eye disease glaucoma in 2003, approximately a year before his death. The procedure involves the use of a tonometer, which contacts the cornea -- an eye tissue that can contain prions, the infectious agent thought to cause CJD.
Ann Marie's concern is that others who had the tonometer used on them could have gotten infected.
A 2003 study by British researchers suggests her concerns may be justified. A team led by J.W. Ironside from the National Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh examined tonometer heads and found they can retain cornea tissue that could infect other people -- even after cleaning and decontaminating the instrument.
"Retained corneal epithelial cells, following the standard decontamination routine of tonometer prisms, may represent potential prion infectivity," the researchers wrote in the British Journal of Ophthalmology last year. "Once the infectious agent is on the cornea, it could theoretically infect the brain."
Prions, misfolded proteins thought to be the cause of mad cow, CJD and similar diseases, are notoriously difficult to destroy and are capable of withstanding most sterilization procedures.
Laura Manuelidis, an expert on these diseases and section chief of surgery in the neuropathology department at Yale University, agreed with the British researchers that tonometers represent a potential risk of passing CJD to other people.
Manuelidis told UPI she has been voicing her concern about the risks of corneas since 1977 when her own study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, showed the eye tissue, if infected, could transmit CJD.
At the time the procedure was done on Richard Da Silva, about a year before he died, she said it was "absolutely" possible he was infectious.
The CJD Incidents Panel, a body of experts set up by the U.K. Department of Health, noted in a 2001 report that procedures involving the cornea are considered medium risk for transmitting CJD. The first two patients who have a contaminated eye instrument used on them have the highest risk of contracting the disease, the panel said.
In 1999, the U.K. Department of Health banned opticians from reusing equipment that came in contact with patients' eyes out of concern it could result in the transmission of variant CJD, the form of the disease humans can contract from consuming infected beef products.
Richard Da Silva was associated with a cluster of five other cases of CJD in southern New York that raised concerns about vCJD.
None of the cases have been determined to stem from mad cow disease, but concerns about the cattle illness in the United States could increase in light of the USDA announcement Thursday that a cow tested positive on initial tests for the disease. If confirmed, this would be the second U.S. case of the illness; the first was detected in a Washington cow last December. The USDA said the suspect animal disclosed Thursday did not enter the food chain. The USDA did not release further details about the cow, but said results from further lab tests to confirm the initial tests were expected within seven days.
Ann Marie Da Silva said she informed the New York Health Department and later the eye doctor who performed the procedure about her husband's illness and her concerns about the risk of transmitting CJD via the tonometer.
The optometrist -- whom she declined to name because she did not want to jeopardize his career -- "didn't even know what this disease was," she said.
"He said the health department never called him and I called them (the health department) back and they didn't seem concerned about it," she added. "I just kept getting angrier and angrier when I felt I was being dismissed."
She said the state health department "seems to have an attitude of don't ask, don't tell" about CJD.
"There's a stigma attached to it," she said. "Is it because they're so afraid the public will panic? I don't know, but I don't think that the answer is to push things under the rug."
New York State Department of Health spokeswoman Claire Pospisil told UPI she would look into whether the agency was concerned about the possibility of transmitting CJD via tonometers, but she had not called back prior to story publication.
Disposable tonometers are readily available and could avoid the risk of transmitting the disease, Ironside and colleagues noted in their study. Ann Marie Da Silva said she asked the optometrist whether he used disposable tonometers and "he said 'No, it's a reusable one.'"
Ironside's team also noted other ophthalmic instruments come into contact with the cornea and could represent a source of infection as they are either difficult to decontaminate or cannot withstand the harsh procedures necessary to inactivate prions. These include corneal burrs, diagnostic and therapeutic contact lenses and other coated lenses.
Terry Singletary, whose mother died from a type of CJD called Heidenhain Variant, told UPI health officials were not doing enough to prevent people from being infected by contaminated medical equipment.
"They've got to start taking this disease seriously and they simply aren't doing it," said Singletary, who is a member of CJD Watch and CJD Voice -- advocacy groups for CJD patients and their families.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention spokeswoman Christine Pearson did not return a phone call from UPI seeking comment. The agency's Web site states the eye is one of three tissues, along with the brain and spinal cord, that are considered to have "high infectivity."
The Web site said more than 250 people worldwide have contracted CJD through contaminated surgical instruments and tissue transplants. This includes as many as four who were infected by corneal grafts. The agency noted no such cases have been reported since 1976, when sterilization procedures were instituted in healthcare facilities.
Ironside and colleagues noted in their study, however, many disinfection procedures used on optical instruments, such as tonometers, fail. They wrote their finding of cornea tissue on tonometers indicates that "no current cleaning and disinfection strategy is fully effective."
Singletary said CDC's assertion that no CJD cases from infected equipment or tissues have been detected since 1976 is misleading.
"They have absolutely no idea" whether any cases have occurred in this manner, he said, because CJD cases often aren't investigated and the agency has not required physicians nationwide report all cases of CJD.
"There's no national surveillance unit for CJD in the United States; people are dying who aren't autopsied, the CDC has no way of knowing" whether people have been infected via infected equipment or tissues, he said.
Ann Marie Da Silva said she has contacted several members of her state's congressional delegation about her concerns, including Rep. Sue Kelly, R-N.Y., and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.
"Basically, what I want is to be a positive force in this, but I also want more of a dialogue going on with the public and the health department," she said.
Friday, December 04, 2009
New guidance on decontamination of trial contact lenses and other contact devices has been revealed for CJD AND vCJD
SUNDAY, JANUARY 17, 2016
Of Grave Concern Heidenhain Variant Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2018
CDC Eyes of CJD patients show evidence of prions concerns for iatrogenic transmission
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2018
Benefit cuts hit mad cow disease sufferer A girl born severely disabled from vCJD may lose her home under universal credit
SATURDAY, MARCH 2, 2019
MAD COW TSE PRION DISEASE AND THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS OF BSe Science $$$
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2019
MAD DOGS AND ENGLISHMEN BSE, SCRAPIE, CWD, CJD, TSE PRION A REVIEW 2019
SUNDAY, MARCH 10, 2019
National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center Cases Examined¹ Updated Feb 1, 2019 Variably protease-sensitive prionopathy VPSPr
2006-2007
HUMAN and ANIMAL TSE Classifications i.e. mad cow disease and the UKBSEnvCJD only theory
TSEs have been rampant in the USA for decades in many species, and they all have been rendered and fed back to animals for human/animal consumption.
I propose that the current diagnostic criteria for human TSEs only enhances and helps the spreading of human TSE from the continued belief of the UKBSEnvCJD only theory in 2007.
With all the science to date refuting it, to continue to validate this myth, will only spread this TSE agent through a multitude of potential routes and sources i.e. consumption, surgical, blood, medical, cosmetics etc.
I propose as with Aguzzi, Asante, Collinge, Caughey, Deslys, Dormont, Gibbs, Ironside, Manuelidis, Marsh, et al and many more, that the world of TSE Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy is far from an exact science, but there is enough proven science to date that this myth should be put to rest once and for all, and that we move forward with a new classification for human and animal TSE that would properly identify the infected species, the source species, and then the route.
This would further have to be broken down to strain of species and then the route of transmission would further have to be broken down.
Accumulation and Transmission are key to the threshold from subclinical to clinical disease, and of that, I even believe that physical and or blunt trauma may play a role of onset of clinical symptoms in some cases, but key to all this, is to stop the amplification and transmission of this agent, the spreading of, no matter what strain.
BUT, to continue with this myth that the U.K. strain of BSE one strain in cows, and the nv/v CJD, one strain in humans, and that all the rest of human TSE is one single strain i.e. sporadic CJD (when to date there are 6 different phenotypes of sCJD), and that no other animal TSE transmits to humans, to continue with this masquerade will only continue to spread, expose, and kill, who knows how many more in the years and decades to come.
ONE was enough for me, My Mom, hvCJD, DOD 12/14/97 confirmed, which is nothing more than another mans name added to CJD, like CJD itself, Jakob and Creutzfeldt, or Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome, just another CJD or human TSE, named after another human.
WE are only kidding ourselves with the current diagnostic criteria for human and animal TSE, especially differentiating between the nvCJD vs the sporadic CJD strains and then the GSS strains and also the FFI fatal familial insomnia strains or the ones that mimics one or the other of those TSE?
Tissue infectivity and strain typing of the many variants of the human and animal TSEs are paramount in all variants of all TSE.
There must be a proper classification that will differentiate between all these human TSE in order to do this.
With the CDI and other more sensitive testing coming about, I only hope that my proposal will some day be taken seriously.
My name is Terry S. Singeltary Sr. and I am no scientist, no doctor and have no PhDs, but have been independently researching human and animal TSEs since the death of my Mother to the Heidenhain Variant of Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease on December 14, 1997 'confirmed'.
...END
Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
Singeltary, Sr et al. JAMA.2001; 285: 733-734. Vol. 285 No. 6, February 14, 2001 JAMA Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
To the Editor:
In their Research Letter, Dr Gibbons and colleagues1 reported that the annual US death rate due to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) has been stable since 1985. These estimates, however, are based only on reported cases, and do not include misdiagnosed or preclinical cases. It seems to me that misdiagnosis alone would drastically change these figures. An unknown number of persons with a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease in fact may have CJD, although only a small number of these patients receive the postmortem examination necessary to make this diagnosis. Furthermore, only a few states have made CJD reportable. Human and animal transmissible spongiform encephalopathies should be reportable nationwide and internationally.
Terry S. Singeltary, Sr Bacliff, Tex
1. Gibbons RV, Holman RC, Belay ED, Schonberger LB. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States: 1979-1998. JAMA. 2000;284:2322-2323.
Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
Singeltary, Sr et al. JAMA.2001; 285: 733-734.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
BMJ
U.S. Scientist should be concerned with a CJD epidemic in the U.S., as well....
02 January 2000
Terry S Singeltary
retired
US scientists develop a possible test for BSE
BMJ 1999; 319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1312b (Published 13 November 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:1312
Rapid responses Response
Re: vCJD in the USA * BSE in U.S.
15 November 1999
Terry S Singeltary
NA
medically retired
January 28, 2003; 60 (2) VIEWS & REVIEWS
Monitoring the occurrence of emerging forms of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States
Ermias D. Belay, Ryan A. Maddox, Pierluigi Gambetti, Lawrence B. Schonberger
First published January 28, 2003, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000036913.87823.D6
Abstract
Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) attracted increased attention in the mid-1980s because of the emergence among UK cattle of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), which has been shown to be transmitted to humans, causing a variant form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). The BSE outbreak has been reported in 19 European countries, Israel, and Japan, and human cases have so far been identified in four European countries, and more recently in a Canadian resident and a US resident who each lived in Britain during the BSE outbreak. To monitor the occurrence of emerging forms of CJD, such as vCJD, in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been conducting surveillance for human TSEs through several mechanisms, including the establishment of the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center. Physicians are encouraged to maintain a high index of suspicion for vCJD and use the free services of the pathology center to assess the neuropathology of clinically diagnosed and suspected cases of CJD or other TSEs.
Received May 7, 2002. Accepted August 28, 2002.
RE-Monitoring the occurrence of emerging forms of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States
Terry S. Singeltary, retired (medically)
Published March 26, 2003
26 March 2003
Terry S. Singeltary, retired (medically) CJD WATCH
I lost my mother to hvCJD (Heidenhain Variant CJD). I would like to comment on the CDC's attempts to monitor the occurrence of emerging forms of CJD. Asante, Collinge et al [1] have reported that BSE transmission to the 129-methionine genotype can lead to an alternate phenotype that is indistinguishable from type 2 PrPSc, the commonest sporadic CJD. However, CJD and all human TSEs are not reportable nationally. CJD and all human TSEs must be made reportable in every state and internationally. I hope that the CDC does not continue to expect us to still believe that the 85%+ of all CJD cases which are sporadic are all spontaneous, without route/source. We have many TSEs in the USA in both animal and man. CWD in deer/elk is spreading rapidly and CWD does transmit to mink, ferret, cattle, and squirrel monkey by intracerebral inoculation. With the known incubation periods in other TSEs, oral transmission studies of CWD may take much longer. Every victim/family of CJD/TSEs should be asked about route and source of this agent. To prolong this will only spread the agent and needlessly expose others. In light of the findings of Asante and Collinge et al, there should be drastic measures to safeguard the medical and surgical arena from sporadic CJDs and all human TSEs. I only ponder how many sporadic CJDs in the USA are type 2 PrPSc?
Reply to Singletary Ryan A. Maddox, MPH Other Contributors: Published March 26, 2003
Mr. Singletary raises several issues related to current Creutzfeldt- Jakob disease (CJD) surveillance activities. Although CJD is not a notifiable disease in most states, its unique characteristics, particularly its invariably fatal outcome within usually a year of onset, make routine mortality surveillance a useful surrogate for ongoing CJD surveillance.[1] In addition, because CJD is least accurately diagnosed early in the course of illness, notifiable-disease surveillance could be less accurate than, if not duplicative of, current mortality surveillance.[1] However, in states where making CJD officially notifiable would meaningfully facilitate the collection of data to monitor for variant CJD (vCJD) or other emerging prion diseases, CDC encourages the designation of CJD as a notifiable disease.[1] Moreover, CDC encourages physicians to report any diagnosed or suspected CJD cases that may be of special public health importance (e.g., vCJD, iatrogenic CJD, unusual CJD clusters).
As noted in our article, strong evidence is lacking for a causal link between chronic wasting disease (CWD) of deer and elk and human disease,[2] but only limited data seeking such evidence exist. Overall, the previously published case-control studies that have evaluated environmental sources of infection for sporadic CJD have not consistently identified strong evidence for a common risk factor.[3] However, the power of a case-control study to detect a rare cause of CJD is limited, particularly given the relatively small number of subjects generally involved and its long incubation period, which may last for decades. Because only a very small proportion of the US population has been exposed to CWD, a targeted surveillance and investigation of unusual cases or case clusters of prion diseases among persons at increased risk of exposure to CWD is a more efficient approach to detecting the possible transmission of CWD to humans. In collaboration with appropriate local and state health departments and the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center, CDC is facilitating or conducting such surveillance and case- investigations, including related laboratory studies to characterize CJD and CWD prions.
Mr. Singletary also expresses concern over a recent publication by Asante and colleagues indicating the possibility that some sporadic CJD cases may be attributable to bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).[4] The authors reported that transgenic mice expressing human prion protein homozygous for methionine at codon 129, when inoculated with BSE prions, developed a molecular phenotype consistent with a subtype of sporadic CJD. Although the authors implied that BSE might cause a sporadic CJD-like illness among persons homozygous for methionine, the results of their research with mice do not necessarily directly apply to the transmission of BSE to humans. If BSE causes a sporadic CJD-like illness in humans, an increase in sporadic CJD cases would be expected to first occur in the United Kingdom, where the vast majority of vCJD cases have been reported. In the United Kingdom during 1997 through 2002, however, the overall average annual mortality rate for sporadic CJD was not elevated; it was about 1 case per million population per year. In addition, during this most recent 6-year period following the first published description of vCJD in 1996, there was no increasing trend in the reported annual number of UK sporadic CJD deaths.[3, 5] Furthermore, surveillance in the UK has shown no increase in the proportion of sporadic CJD cases that are homozygous for methionine (Will RG, National CJD Surveillance Unit, United Kingdom, 2003; personal communication).
References
1. Gibbons RV, Holman RC, Belay ED, Schonberger LB. Diagnosis and reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. JAMA 2001;285:733-734.
2. Belay ED, Maddox RA, Gambetti P, Schonberger LB. Monitoring the occurrence of emerging forms of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States. Neurology 2003;60:176-181.
3. Belay ED. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in humans. Annu Rev Microbiol 1999;53:283-314.
4. Asante EA, Linehan JM, Desbruslais M, et al. BSE prions propagate as either variant CJD-like or sporadic CJD-like prion strains in transgenic mice expressing human prion protein. EMBO J 2002;21:6358-6366.
5. The UK Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance Unit. CJD statistics. Available at: http://www.cjd.ed.ac.uk/figures.htm. Accessed February 18, 2003.
Competing Interests: None declared.
doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00715-1 Copyright © 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Newsdesk
Tracking spongiform encephalopathies in North America
Xavier Bosch
Available online 29 July 2003.
Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2003, Page 463
“My name is Terry S Singeltary Sr, and I live in Bacliff, Texas. I lost my mom to hvCJD (Heidenhain variant CJD) and have been searching for answers ever since. What I have found is that we have not been told the truth. CWD in deer and elk is a small portion of a much bigger problem..” ............................
Terry S. Singeltary Sr., Bacliff, Texas USA 77518, Galveston Bay...on the bottom...flounder9@verizon.net
posted by Terry S. Singeltary Sr. at
9:26 PM
<< Home